Use case registry

Software & DevOps

Draft pull request reviews for you to edit and send

The poster built a review inbox where Claude Code drafts reviews for piled-up PRs and the user can discuss, rewrite or delete findings before sending.

What they did

The poster built Cerber to watch GitHub for pull requests requesting their review, run Claude Code through the user’s existing CLI login, and prepare draft reviews in a local web UI. The agent produces a summary, change walkthrough, and proposed inline comments; the user can discuss findings with it, rewrite or delete comments, then manually send the review from their own account.

How it went

It helped with a queue that had grown to 15 PRs and avoided unreviewed AI comments being posted straight to GitHub. It still depends on sending code to Anthropic, requires a paid Claude Code subscription, and only auto-sends approvals if you opt in and they meet a confidence threshold.

Worth knowing

By default, review drafts and state stay on your machine, command execution is read-only unless you explicitly trust the author or org, and sending remains manual.

Labels

ScopeBusinessThe poster built Cerber to watch GitHub for pull requests requesting their review, run Claude Code through the user’s existing CLI login, and prepare draft reviews in a local web UI.

For whomCompanyThe poster built Cerber to watch GitHub for pull requests requesting their review, run Claude Code through the user’s existing CLI login, and prepare draft reviews in a local web UI.

What the agent doesAnalysis and reportsThe agent produces a summary, change walkthrough, and proposed inline comments

How autonomous the agent isPrepares, a person actsthe user can discuss findings with it, rewrite or delete comments, then manually send the review from their own account.

Agent or ordinary appAgent productThe agent produces a summary, change walkthrough, and proposed inline comments

Already a company's productNoThe poster built a review inbox where Claude Code drafts reviews for piled-up PRs and the user can discuss, rewrite or delete findings before sending.

What kind of materialunverifiedFirst-hand accountIt helped with a queue that had grown to 15 PRs and avoided unreviewed AI comments being posted straight to GitHub.

The “Material” label failed its quality check and is not used for selection.

Details

Agents: Claude Code
Source: Reddit
Source date: undated
Accounts: 1
In registry since: Oct 12, 2026

Original source ↗